Lech Lecha

lech-lecha
You can find the rest of the parsha text on Chabad.org at Lech Lecha.

41 thoughts on “Lech Lecha

  1. Aryae Post author

    Rabbi Sholom Brodt

    The Holy Zohar says that “Lech Lecha” is an instruction to “prepare yourself.” The Alexander Rebbe zt”l interpreted “Lech Lecha” as an instruction to do one’s best to improve oneself. One needs to consider at all times, where am I in this journey of my life, how much progress am I making?

    The Alexander Rebbe taught in the name of the Psischer Rebbe zt”l that when learning Torah we are trying to get to the “the land which I will show you.” We want to see what Hashem wants us to see in His Holy Torah; we want the holy words of the Torah to shine unto us with Hashem’s light. To reach the level of learning where every letter is shining with holiness we need to first do tshuvah. Then “ar’ehkah”- I will show you.”

    =========

    Vayomer Hashem el Avram: “Lech lecha mei’artzecha, mimoladetcha, u’meebeit avicha, el ha’aretz asher ar’ehkah.”- Hashem said to Avram: “Go for/unto yourself, from your country, from your birthplace, from the home of your father, unto the land which I will show you.” (Gen. 12:1)

    Many Chassidic masters have commented on this verse. Chassidus sees every verse of the Torah as containing a personal lesson in serving Hashem. So when Hashem says to Avram, Lech Lecha… He is speaking to every Jewish soul, telling each one of us to leave our ‘eretz’- country, birthplace and father’s home and go to land that Hashem will show us. (You will find a number of these teachings further on among the teachings from previous years.) Today we will learn a new interpretation from the second last Rebbe of Lubavitch, Reb Yosef Yitzchak zt”l, known as the ‘frierdiger Rebbe’.

    “Lech lecha” means ‘journey to yourself’ i.e. journey to and connect with your higher self. “Mei’artzecha, mimoladetcha, u’meebeit avicha,” describes how to make the journey.

    Chassidus explains that only a part of your neshama- soul is actually present in your body; only some of the light of your neshama is present within you. The essence of your soul, however, remains above, connected in union with the Living G-d. And so, Hashem’s command, “lech lecha”, is a command to ascend and connect with the root of your soul, so that the root-source of your soul will shine and enlighten the glow of your soul that is present in your body.
    And how is this to be accomplished? The first step is “Mei’artzecha”- to leave your ‘eretz’- your land. In Chassidic teachings we learn that the word “eretz” is also related to ‘ratzon’- will and desires. Thus ‘lech lecha mei’artzecha’ means to leave behind your material and earthly desires; instead, desire only Torah and mitzvot and matters of Godliness.
    The next step is “mimoladetcha”- to leave your birthplace. This represents leaving your acquired habits that confuse and hinder you from progressing in your service of Hashem. You must liberate yourself from these.

    The third step is “u’meebeit avicha”- from the house of your father. This represents your ‘natural’ ways of thinking, i.e. thinking defined by world and body. The world we live in makes demands on us, as does the body; they demand of the mind to think on their terms, to use its intelligence to fulfill their needs.

    A mind that is enslaved to worldly and bodily concerns can easily lose its sense of priorities. I once heard this interesting social observation, which illustrates the workings of this trap. In olden times, not that long ago, our grandparents used to live in small two room homes, with as many as ten or twelve children. Yet there was always room for two poor people to join the family at their meals. Eventually we came to America where our homes got bigger and our families got smaller, and there was no longer any room for the poor to sit at our tables. And then our homes got to be even larger, as our families got smaller and it became the custom of the land that each child got to have his own room, and tragically many homes are no longer big enough for the families to stay together.

    “El ha’aretz asher ar’ehkah”- to the land that I will show you. We do have to live in this world; we have to live in the land that Hashem will show us. We need to learn how to live and function in this world in accordance with the way Hashem sees it and shows it to us. The world still remains a physical world as Hashem desires it to be. But when we see it through Hashem’s eyes, there is much advantage to it. Thus Hashem is telling each one of us to exchange our worldly way of looking at the world, and see it in the way Hashem shows it to us.

    Reply
  2. Aryae Post author

    Originally posted by Wendy

    Rabbi Shefa Gold

    ~ Rabbi Shefa Gold’s Torah Journeys ~

    Lekh Lekha

    (Go to Yourself)

    Genesis 12:1 – 17:27

    Abram is called to leave his home and go on a journey. When he reaches the Land that God shows him, Abram has to leave it because there is a famine. He goes down to Egypt and back again, encounters many challenges, receives the blessing of Malchitzedek and is given a Divine promise. He has visions and makes a convenant with God.

    THE BLESSING

    WE ARE BLESSED THIS WEEK WITH A MAP for the spiritual journey: the soul’s path to awakening. I call it the “Covenantal Journey,” because it describes the maturation of the soul as it rises to stand in covenant with God. We begin this journey from wherever we are now. The invitation to embark is heard at the soul’s crossroad, calling to all that would hear.

    It is Rumi’s invitation:

    “Come, come whoever you are! Wanderer, worshipper,
    lover of leaving, come. This is not a caravan of despair.
    It doesn’t matter if you’ve broken your vows a thousand times,
    still, come, and yet again Come!”1

    Rabbi Yehudah Leib Alter of Ger sees this as a journey of self-realization.

    “Go to the Land that I will show you – where I will make
    you VISIBLE – where your potential being will be realized
    in multiform and unpredictable ways.”2

    THE JOURNEY IS MAPPED IN SEVEN STAGES, mirroring events in the life of Abram/Abraham:

    LEAVING – Abram leaves his home, family and everything familiar to set off for the unknown in order to “become a blessing.”

    We sever the fixed identification with body, small self, social identity, and begin to re-integrate our lost essence, reclaiming parts of ourselves that got lost during the socialization process.

    DISAPPOINTMENT – As soon as Abram arrives in The Land, there is a famine, which necessitates the journey down into Egypt and back again.

    We discover that defeat can be a teacher as we learn to unmask even disaster as a blessing in disguise. The difficulties in our lives send us to our own depths where we find the core of our passion, vision, mission and love.

    DEVELOPMENT – Abram becomes a warrior in order to redeem his captive nephew, Lot.

    Becoming a spiritual warrior requires cultivating and honing the skills and courage that are required on the path. We nurture those qualities that will help us to redeem and maintain our own family ties.

    INITIATION – Abram receives the blessing of Malchitzedek who invokes “El Elyon” (the God Most High).

    There are moments of epiphany on the spiritual journey when we receive an initiation, enter upon a wider perspective and enjoy access to a greater flow of blessing. Our identification with that which is “The Highest” – El Elyon – lifts us up to a new level.

    EXPANSION – Abram looks to the stars (where before he looked to the dust) and receives a vision and promise of descendents and a place in the world.

    We expand our sense of reality and know that we are connected even to the farthest star. This vision sustains us through times of contraction (when we lose our conviction of that deep and wide connection.

    PROPHECY- Abram performs a powerful ritual and receives a startling vision, which reaches far into the future, through slavery and redemption.

    All of the hard work of spiritual practice brings us to a place of Prophecy, where the structures of Time and Space dissolve, and we can see the whole of our journey in this expanded moment.

    COVENANT – Abram is called into covenant and receives a piece of God’s name (the letter hey) incorporated into his own. As Abraham, he is given the mitzvah of circumcision as a physical sign of that covenant.

    We receive the blessing of God’s essence (Name) at the very core of our identity. Our calling is to reflect that core essence and allow it to shine through the prisms of our unique inclinations, experience and personality.

    THE SPIRITUAL CHALLENGE

    HAVING A MAP and knowing that we are on a journey awakens us to the realization of the wondrous path we’ve traveled thus far, and to the road beneath our feet, which is fraught with dangers and strewn with treasures. We can use maps to orient ourselves, recognize landmarks on our way, discern when we’ve hit a dead end, and inspire us to new adventures.

    EACH BLESSING ON THE JOURNEY OF ABRAHAM holds a challenge for the soul. Leaving the known world without knowing the destination, our challenge is to trust the journey itself and to risk being “no one.”
    When we encounter disappointment or tragedy, we are challenged to surrender expectations and plant the seeds of compassion. Our lives become a journey of purification and as we are called into service, we are challenged to cultivate the qualities that are required for the work.
    We are guided on the path just one step at a time as we seek out teachers, open to their wisdom, receive moments of initiation, and then spend years dedicated to integrating those moments.
    Every initiation opens the way for an expansion of perspective and we are challenged to stay focused as we widen the view.
    When those expansive states offer us moments of prophetic vision, the challenge is to allow those visions to transform our lives, moment-to-moment.
    In accepting upon ourselves the covenant, the agreement to walk with God in simplicity and open-heartedness, we also take on the mitzvah of the circumcision of our hearts. Here the challenge is to continually cut through and release layers of distortion and defense that lay upon the heart, so that we can receive reality in its sparkling essence.

    1 The Illuminated Rumi by Coleman Barks (Broadway Books, 1997). Rumi was 13th Century Sufi Mystic.

    2 Rabbi Yehudah Leib Alter of Ger, Sefer Sefat Emet al ha-Torah u-Mo’adim, Lekh Lekha. I learned this text from Rabbi Art Green.

    3 Spirit Buddies by Rabbi Shefa Gold. http://www.rabbishefagold.com/spiritbuddies.html.

    For Guidelines for Practice please click link to website: http://rabbishefagold.com/LechLcha.html

    Reply
  3. Aryae Post author

    Wendy Berk

    Rashi writes that Malki Zedik, king of Shaleim and Kohein of the Most High Almighty is Shem, son of Noach. Shem along with Ever established the Yeshivah of Shem and Ever. Our patriarchs, Avraham, Yizchok (after the Akeida), and Yaacov are said to have studied there. Rashi writes that Rivkah also went to “the house of study of Sheim to inquire of Adonoy” what would happen to the two twins that battled inside her. She was told by direct Divine communication that there were two nations in her womb.

    Reply
  4. Aryae Post author

    Originally posted by Wendy

    Avielah Barclay Soferet

    בס’ד

    Be-reyshit/Genesis 16:5, Parshat Lekh Lekha has a letter Yud which is naqud, dotted above, in the word “u-veynekha”. This word can be found in the following Chumashim: Plaut p.111, Cohen p.76, Hertz p.56, Sforno p.77, JPS p.22, Jerusalem p.15, Stone p. 70…

    וַתֹּאמֶר שָׂרַי אֶל-אַבְרָם, חֲמָסִי עָלֶיךָ–אָנֹכִי נָתַתִּי שִׁפְחָתִי בְּחֵיקֶךָ, וַתֵּרֶא כִּי הָרָתָה וָאֵקַל בְּעֵינֶיהָ; יִשְׁפֹּט יְהוָה, בֵּינִי וּבֵינֶיךָ.

    And Sarai said to Av’ram: ‘This outrage (Hamas) against me is your fault: I gave my maid into your embrace; and when she saw that she had conceived, I was lowered in her eyes: may G@d judge between us.’

    “Va-tomer Sarai el Av’ram chamasi alekha – anokhi natati shif’chati be-cheyqekha va-teyre ki ha-ratah va-eyqal be-eyne’ah; Y’shepot YHVH beyni u-veynekha.”

    Sarah intends her words to remain a private conversation between her and her husband as words between them should be of no concern to others. (Avot deRebbe Natan 30b)

    Names in Tanakh are really roles; the expression of that person’s neshamah/soul.
    Sarai/Sarah = female ruler/noblewoman; to struggle, to wrestle, to overcome.
    Av’ram/Avraham = Big Daddy
    Hagar = the stranger/outsider

    Sarah used Hagar as a means to an end. According to the code of Hammurabi, the common law at that time and place, Hagar remained Sarah’s property and any children Avraham had through Hagar would legally be considered Sarah’s. So Sarah was within her rights to beat Hagar for belittling her, which Avraham supported in the narrative. However, any wife would expect her husband to defend their relationship against another woman intruding on their marriage, which is why Sarah blames her actions on Avraham. Had he protected Sarah’s vulnerability from Hagar, she wouldn’t have had to take matters into her own hands.

    That Yud is dotted because of agency – it’s a yad, hand! This is a power struggle. And not just a cat fight between rivals, but a revisitation of the balance of a long, lovingly established marriage which, like all marriages, has its challenges.

    Reply
  5. Aryae Post author

    From Breslov.com

    “Friction developed between the herdsmen of Abram’s flocks and those of Lot… Abram said to Lot, ‘Let’s not have friction between me and you … Seperate from me, if you [go to] the left, I will go to the right; if to the right, I will take the left” (Genesis 13:7-9)

    BALANCING RIGHT AND THE LEFT, NEEDS COMPENSATION AND COMPROMISE
    G-d, who is hidden behind the veils of the material world, created the world so that man, using his intelligence and the faculty of free choice can discover Him hiding within the creation. Since the physical world veils G-d, we must be involved in it so that we can reveal Him. To discover and experience G-d in this world, one must access energies that are derived from both the right and left sides of the spiritual spectrum which is the source of free-choice. The left side is responsible for mental and physical limitation and for the base urges of the body. The right side is associated with expansion of one’s mental and physical resources, allowing one to become strongly connected to G-d. How does one find G-d, concealed in the darkness and physicality of this world? If G-d wanted us to find Him, wouldn’t it be easier and make more sense for us, as many other religions profess, to search for the spiritual G-d in the spiritual realms, and not get involved with the physical, which is so far removed from Him? The Talmud teaches: “Rabbi Yaakov said: ‘[Involvement in the gross materialism of] This world is like a lobby [which one must encounter] before [meriting] the world to come; prepare yourself in the lobby [by adhering to G-d’s wishes] so that you may enter the banquet hall.'” (Talmud: Avoth 4:21) This alludes to adhering to G-d’s commandments while encountering the gross materialism of this world which sanctifies the material realm as well as the left side of the spiritual spectrum. When the material realm is sanctified, many of the material veils behind which G-d hides are stripped away, allowing better perception of and connection to G-d. According to Rav Noson, the veils that are peeled away are merged with a person’s soul, acting as filters of G-d’s great light, enabling each person to come very close to G-d in this world and, especially, in the hereafter. This is why the angels cannot come as close to G-d as man, for they lack the necessary material filters to protect them.

    Reply
  6. Wendy

    From Reb Zalman

    How to Develop Your God-Connections
    The following text by Reb Zalman is for this week’s Torah portion, Shabbos Lech Lecha. [Notes by Gabbai Seth Fishman, BLOG Editor]:

    “Go out … to the land I will show you” (Genesis 12:1).

    And, indeed, there is, at times, some influence that will make some faint impression upon us.

    [Note: An impression, or an inspiration. We are being asked to relate this text to those experiences we have had as interactions with the divine, or God-connections. Gabbai Seth]

    Just as when someone snaps a picture, and until the film is developed, the picture can’t be seen, and not even if the camera is opened to the light at which time the faint impression is destroyed.

    For this reason, Hashem Yisborach said to him: “Leave your land,” and this is like the developer, “your birthplace” – stop bath, “your father’s house” – fixer, “to the land that I will show you,” and later (ibid 18:1) “and Havaye appeared to him in Elone Mamre,” i.e., Hashem became visible.

    [Note: For photos, the developer converts the latent image to metallic silver, the stop bath is a solution to set the proper contrast and the fixer makes the image permanent.

    In order to take hold of the inspiration, to get it clear, to internalize it, we must sort through our root metaphors so that our connection to the source of all being will become clear and strong. Like Abraham, the root metaphors which we have when we enter adulthood come from influences of country (artzecha), an indigenous culture (moladiticha) or religion (beis avicha).]

    Now each person has hir individual attribute (Sefirah) according to the root of hir soul “[You made wraps for the Ten S’firot] from whence blossom forth souls for the sons of men.” (cf, discourse Patach Eliyahu / “Elijah began”, Tikunei Zohar 17. ) And so Hashem Yitbarach said to Abraham our father (may he rest in peace) (Genesis 15:1) “I am thy shield.” [Do not fear for] you will also get to see Him again when you will lose your attribute at the end of malchut sheb’chesed,

    [NOTE: Chesed is associated with Avraham Avinu as per his preoccupation with Gemilut Chassadim / acts of generosity. When we count Sefirot from Chesed to Malchut the last stop in the week of Chesed is Malchut Sheb’Chesed. After that, we are in the week of Gevurah, the attribute of Yitzchak. Gabbai Seth]

    as seasons will shift and times will change; do not be afraid for I, as implied [in my unity], am thy Shield, that although, for you, there may be only a part,

    [NOTE: It is difficult to see beyond the parts to the whole in which they are rooted, i.e. we will experience Chesed/Gevurah as either/or.]

    for Me, nothing is lost: I am also the Anochi of Chesed Sheb’Gevurah. For the quality of the Anochi is beyond the individual attributes, and when all is said and done, (Isaiah 51:12) “I am S/He Who comforts you.”

    “But the men of Sodom were evil and sinful — before Hashem exceedingly” (Genesis 13:13).

    Once on the holiday of Purim, when papa (z’l) went to gather donations on behalf of the decent poor and to free those imprisoned, there was one miserly man who skirted us by pretending he was praying the Amidah; and quietly to him, papa (z’l) whispered the phrase, “‘the men of Sodom were evil and sinful,’ but they looked like they were in devekut — ‘before Hashem exceedingly.’”

    The first prayer in tanach was that of Abraham Avinu on behalf of Sodom (ibid 18:23). And why didn’t S/He affirmatively comply regarding that which they requested? The answer to this question is that the situation shows that prayer by itself does not influence if it is not aligned with God’s will and there’s no other significance to this than “Our eyes [look toward and] depend upon You, etc.” (Rosh Hashanah Mussaf prayer).

    [NOTE: I.e. We don’t pray to get God to do something, like a cosmic bellhop. We pray because we are in a relationship and we love to let God know what is in our hearts (and we are respectful of the power of that place).]

    Rabbi Zalman Schachter-Shalomi
    from Yishmiru Daat (2009 revision),
    “Parashat Lech Lecha,” p. 30

    Reply
  7. Wendy

    From Reb Miles Krassen

    Lekh Lekha The Land that I AM will Reveal to You

    Like many other wisdom traditions, the Torah teaches that the path to true greatness is fraught with many challenges. Sometimes a person, despite the challenges, does succeed in attaining an extraordinary degree of holiness during her life. The person may even reveal so strong an emanation of one of the divine attributes that others continue to derive energy and guidance from that exemplary life, long after the person has passed from this world. We call such a person a tzaddik. Accordingly, in our tradition, we say: “the memory of a tzaddik is a blessing.”
    However, in drawing to ourselves the blessings of tzaddikim, we should resist the temptation to sugarcoat the experience of becoming a tzaddik. The path of the tzaddik-in-training is often a painful transformation, during which it is necessary to constantly cultivate and harmonize all parts of the self, so that a holy soul can increasingly manifest within us. No matter how lofty the source of our souls may be, few of us, if any, are born in an already perfected form. Awakening necessitates facing many tests.

    In the case of Avraham, who succeeded in becoming an archetype of the divine attribute of Hesed (unconditional love), the Torah hints at his transformation by making clear that he was born Avram (Genesis 11:26) and only later became “Avraham.” (Genesis 17:5). Avram’s path from ordinary person to tzaddik is framed by the Hebrew words “lekh lekha. (“Get yourself going”). Few would dispute that Avraham’s greatest test occurred later in the Torah, when he was commanded to sacrifice his son. There it is written, Lekh lekha to the Land of Moriyah (Divine Awe). (Genesis 22:2). This was Avraham’s greatest test because it required him to overcome his own natural tendency to express Hesed (unconditional love). Yet, in the Midrash (Bereishit Rabbah 39:9), Rabbi Levi, noting that the same words, lekh lekha, appear in our parashah, wonders whether Avram’s initial test may not, in its own way, be as great as the later one. (See Netivot Shalom, Lekh—Lekha).
    Avram perceived Be-ing softly vibrating within him as the words lekh lekha. (Genesis 12:1). What was the great challenge implicit in this perception? Most Hasidic commentators read the Hebrew hyper-literally as “go to yourself.” Although what “yourself” may mean is interpreted in various ways, there is general agreement that Avram is being aroused to a quest to discover and follow his unique self.

    Before awakening, all of us are a composite of influences, from our culture, our nature, and our family. This is the great archetypal challenge that we all face: Avraham sensed Be-ing softly arousing him to seek his own unique self, apart from cultural influences, innate tendencies, and influences from his family… (Genesis 12:1).

    To enter the path of a tzaddik-in-training, we begin by noticing how we are limited by these unconscious formations. There is a growing sense that we are really something more than this composite personality, and dissatisfied with its limitations. This is Be-ing’s way of prompting us to become more conscious through seeking a more authentic self.

    In our culture, many people are encouraged to be unique individuals and yet few become tzaddikim like Avraham. The reason is that for most of us, development doesn’t reach beyond a lekh lekha that simply means “go get it for yourself.” What made Avram capable of entering the path of the tzaddik is that he heard a deeper message in Be-ing’s admonition lekh lekha. The tzaddik-in-training is not satisfied with pursuing narcissistic gratification through individualistic achievements. What motivated Avram was a desire to consciously seek and connect with the deepest part of the soul, called heleq ‘eloha mima’al (a portion of Divinity). (Job 31:2). What he heard Be-ing whispering was Seek the source of your soul in the Land that I AM will reveal to you. (Genesis 12:1).

    Our challenge is to discover within ourselves not just a self that is unique, but one that is also holy. One of the great miracles of a divine creation is that every individual element expresses a facet of divinity in a unique way. But the beauty of each unique being is only revealed when we are conscious of our divine source. As Reb Natan of Nemirov teaches in the name of Rebbe Nachman of Breslov, wherever we find ourselves, we should always seek the inner point of the source of our soul. Whenever we are centered in our soul’s source, we can become, like Avraham, a channel of Hesed (Divine Love). Then our motivation in life is to make ourselves and others better expressions of the divine purpose in creation.
    The Rebbe Elimelekh makes clear that seeking the source of our soul is not meant to radically detach ourselves from this world. Rather, we are to seek a connection to our soul within all of the various components of our experience: Find your real self within your earthiness, feeling states, and thought forms. (Genesis 12:1).

    Although the path of the tzaddik-in-training promises a most meaningful and rewarding life, we should always remember that it is not an easy path. Avram was already seventy five years old when he mastered his anger and even then his shadow (Lot) still accompanied him. (Genesis 12:4).
    What then enabled Avram to transcend less spiritual modes of achievement? He was willing to follow guidance that came from beyond the personal self. Avram realized that his success in life depended on attunement with a Higher Source and he was willing to follow Be-ing, even when he did not know where It was leading him.
    Seek your real self… in a Land that I AM will reveal to you. Then I AM will make you great; I AM will bless you; I AM will expand your vessel’s capacity to contain holiness; and you yourself will have the power of blessing others. (Genesis12:1-2).

    Avram’s first great test was to accept Be-ing’s command to put aside personal self-interest and to seek a more authentic self in a way that would only later be revealed to him. Through his willingness to constantly seek the source of his soul, Avram became a devotee of Be-ing and entered the path of the tzaddik.

    May we all be stirred by the call of Be-ing

    And enter the path of the Tzaddik-in-training.

    May we constantly seek the Source of our soul

    And become channels of Divine Love,

    Through the blessing of the tzaddik Avraham.

    Amen.
    Rabbi Moshe Aharon Ladizhyner
    5767

    Reply
  8. Wendy

    From Rav DovBer Pinson

    B”H

    Week’s Energy for Parshas Lech Lecha
    Rav DovBer Pinson

    Flexibility & Movement
    This weeks Torah portion begins with the instruction to Avraham/Abraham “…Lech L’cha/ Go forth from your land and from your birthplace and from your father’s house, to the land that I will show you.” (12:1)

    Thus begins the journey of Avraham, beginning with the leaving of his “home land” and the place of his comfort zone, and journeying to the place of his destiny.

    Avraham is invited to take this incredible journey of becoming a great and influential man (Midrash), an invitation to self actualize and deeply discovering the essence of his being (Zohar.) To do so, he must leave Three things – his ‘land,’ ‘birthplace,’ and ‘father’s house.’

    These three represent the things that we use as an excuse to stay inflexible and unmoving.

    ‘Your land’ refers to our space which is our physical location.
    ‘Birthplace’ infers our particular time, the era in which we live.
    ‘Father’s house’ references our unique genetics.

    It is common that we make excuses for ourselves that allow us to stay in one place and not live our life to its fullest. We rationalize why we stay stuck in our circumstances. We may tell ourselves, ‘its not the right time’, ‘maybe later on in life’, ‘I’m not in the right place’, or ‘I don’t have it in me’, ie; its not within my genetics.

    This week’s energy provides us with the strength and ability to be flexible. We challenge ourselves by coming out of our comfort zone and entering the unknown, in order to grow and discover our deepest self.

    The Energy of the Week:
    Flexibility & Movement
    This week’s energy is to overcome stubbornness and inflexibility. Don’t say, its not the right space, not the right time, or i don’t have the strength. Stop making excuses.

    This is a good week to begin a journey… or make a move that you have been holding off on. If an opportunity to do something or go somewhere new arises – take advantage of the added strength of flexibility and make the move.

    Reply
  9. Wendy

    From Chabad.org

    And G-d spoke to Abram: “Go you from your land…” (12:1)

    From the time that G-d said to our father Abraham, “Go from your land…” and “Abraham went on, journeying southward”, began the process of birurim — of extracting the sparks of holiness that are scattered throughout the universe and buried within the material existence.

    By the decree of Divine providence, a person wanders about in his travels to those places where the sparks that are to be extracted by him await their redemption. The Cause of All Causes brings about the many circumstances and pretexts that bring a person to those places where his personal mission in life is to be acted out.

    (Rabbi Sholom DovBer of Lubavitch)

    —————————————–

    Go you from your land, from your birthplace and from your father’s house, to the land which I will show you (12:1)

    “From your land” — from your will (eretz, the Hebrew word for land, is etymologically related to the word ratzon–will). “From your birthplace” — from your emotional and behavioral self (which is the product of a person’s environment). “From your father’s house” — from your intellect (In the terminology of Kabbalah, the intellect is referred to as the father within man, since it is the progenitor of and authority over his feelings and behavior patterns).

    (The Chassidic Masters)

    ———————————————————————————————————

    Not a thread nor a shoe-strap, nor I shall take anything that is yours (14:23)

    In reward for Abraham’s saying, “Not a thread nor a shoe-strap,” his children merited two mitzvot: the thread of blue [in the tzitzit] and the strap of the tefillin.

    (Talmud, Sotah 17a)
    ———————————————————————————————————
    ——————————————————————————–

    And an angel of G-d found her. And he said; And an angel of G-d said to her; And an angel of G-d said to her; And an angel of G-d said to her (16:7, 8, 9, 10, 11)

    How many angels did she meet? Rabbi Yossi bar Chananiah said: Five; each time that it says “and he said” it was another angel. The other sages say: Four; each time it says “an angel,” it was another angel.

    Said Rabbi Chiya: See the difference between the earlier and later generations! Manoach said to his wife, “We shall surely die, for we have seen an angel” (Judges 13:22); but Hagar the maid of Sarah sees five angels one after the other and is not afraid of them” Said Rabbi Yitzchak: “The members of Abraham’s household were all prophets–she was used to seeing them.”

    (Midrash Rabbah)
    ———————————————————————————————————-

    ——————————————————————————–

    No longer shall your name be called Abram. Your name shall be Abraham, for I have made you a father of a multitude of nations (17:5)

    Abraham’s name change, in conjunction with his circumcision and his entry into a covenant with G-d, marked a profound turning point in his life. Up until this point, the thrust of Abraham’s life was his spiritual relationship with G-d; from this point on it was to be his role as a leader of the masses, a teacher of the Divine truth to the “multitudes”. Thus the Hebrew letter Heh was added to his name. Abram (Avram, in the Hebrew) is an acronym of av ram, which means exalted father; Abraham stands for av hamon goyim–a father of multitudes of nations.

    But according to this, his name should have been changed to Abham. Why was the letter Reish, which stood for the ram (exalted) in his name, left in? There is no Reish in the phrase a father of multitudes of nations.

    Often, there is a tendency for teachers and leaders to water down their message to their constituents. For myself, they say, I must set the highest standards and strive to understand the most sublime truths. But it is foolish to expect the same of everyone else. If I speak of such matters and make such demands, I will only be perceived as out of touch with reality. Indeed, the rarefied insight and pious behavior I have attained will only be coarsened and debased by its communication to the masses.

    Therein lies the lesson of the “irremovable Reish” in Abraham’s name. G-d added a Heh, anointing him as a leader for the hamon (multitudes), but left the Reish of exalted in. For the true mark of a teacher is one who can convey the most sublime truths to the most ordinary of minds, and the true mark of a leader is one who can inspire the loftiest aspirations in the most mundane of hearts. Such a teacher and leader was Abraham, and such is the quality of leadership he bequeathed to his heirs in their role as a light unto the nations.

    (From the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe)

    Reply
  10. Wendy

    From Rabbi James Stone Goodman 2007

    O holy Shabbes Inpsiration Lech Lecha

    When Abraham was born
    a star rose in the east
    swallowed the four stars of the four winds of heaven –

    to the east
    to the north
    to the west
    to the south

    Avraham’s star
    a star of the east
    swallowed the four directions.

    God said to Avram
    lift up your eyes and look from the place where you are
    north and south and east and west
    for all the land which you see I shall give it to you
    and to your seed
    forever [Genesis 13:14]

    When the King Nimrod went riding
    he looked up into heaven
    saw a holy light over the Juderia
    the Jewish quarter
    signifying the birth of Abraham our father
    dear father
    blessed father

    light of Israel. [Cuando El Rey Nimrod]

    God in a specially created voice, unlike other voices
    spoke to him from behind the curtain of heaven:

    Avram, lech lecha
    go, get thee out,
    out of your country
    and away from your kindred
    and away from your father’s house
    to a land that I will show you. [Genesis 12:1]

    Get free first of your country
    the simplest
    then your kindred
    more difficult
    lastly your father’s house
    a lifetime
    maybe more

    and then
    sometimes
    we return.

    How I miss you
    buried now in a cemetery in Detroit
    on Shabbes lech lecha
    I am coming home
    I walk into your kitchen
    make tea.

    I never left
    I am coming home
    slowly slowly.

    I am wondering what Avram
    owes his father Terach
    Terach brought them out of Ur
    took them as far as Haran [Genesis 11:31]
    Avram left Haran
    lech lecha Terach heard
    away from your father’s house
    lech lecha Avram heard
    away from your father’s house

    we are all leaving our father’s house
    all the time.

    Father took me as far as Haran
    Harry – I am leaving Haran
    for you
    and me.

    Avraham heard
    Lecha lecha — go get thee out
    leave your past your shame your violence your wars
    your inherited enmity

    go to a land
    a new land
    that I will show you.

    And Abraham went
    as God spoke with him.

    At the end of his life
    Abraham ascended to the top of the chariot of Ezekiel
    it was covered with the dew of light

    From atop Ezekiel’s chariot
    Avraham dressed in hand-me-down celestial garments
    saw the future
    a vision of reconciliation
    from what was missing in his generation
    he saw the perfect peace of his descendants

    reconciling
    repairing

    There was something partial
    missing
    broken
    chaser
    in Abraham’s generation
    that only the future could repair [Zohar]
    the children of Abraham
    Isaac and Ishmael
    and all the Isaacs and Ishmaels
    long into the future
    Abraham — go forth and make a path for your children
    for everything that happened to you
    will happen to your children [Bereshit Rabbah 40:6]

    We say to you today in a loud and clear voice
    enough of blood and tears. Enough. [Rabin]

    From atop Ezekiel’s chariot
    Avraham saw and understood everything

    Just as Avraham left his father’s house
    so his children left his house –

    lech lecha they heard
    get thee out
    out of your country
    and away from your kindred
    and away from your father’s house

    to a land that I will show you

    And from atop Ezekiel’s chariot
    Avraham whispered
    amen.

    jsg, usa

    Reply
  11. Wendy

    From Rabbi Rachel Barenblat
    Written for Radical Torah in 2006.
    Going Forth into Something New

    “Go you forth,” “Go out of your land” (or maybe “Go to yourself”) — so begins this week’s parsha, Lekh Lekha. God calls Abraham forth to leave what’s familiar and comfortable to him — his origin, his roots, his old patterns of behavior and belief — and to venture forth into an unknown world, to journey toward the place where God will bring him. Through this journey, God promises, he will make of Abraham a blessing.

    This took place, the text tells us, when Abraham was 75 years old. No spring chicken, Abraham. When God deemed him good and ready, then the call came. We may not hear so direct an exhortation in our own spiritual lives, but who could fail to be moved by the notion that when we have matured as far as we can on our own, God calls us forth to venture into a new phase of becoming? The whole human process of growing up is mirrored in Abraham’s leap from the familiar into the unknown.

    Of course, that’s not the only way to read the beginning of the parsha. On the surface level, God instructs Abraham to leave his land, his birthplace, and his father’s house — to be a literal wanderer. God also instructs him, in at least in one Hasidic understanding, to leave his earthiness behind and to move into an entirely new state of consciousness.

    The Meor Eynayim notes that Abraham, like Jacob and like Moses, is often called-to twice (think of that critical “Abraham, Abraham!” in the akedah narrative.) He argues that the two namings correspond to two aspects of the tzaddik, his earthly or embodied self and his elevated or “root” self. The use of a doubled name “is taken by the Meor Eynayim to reflect a deeper doubleness or duality: namely, his ability to be equally present, equally at home, in both the supernal, heavenly worlds and in this earthly, corporeal world,” as Rabbi Jonathan Chipman writes.

    We are called to be like Abraham: to trust in our Source as we journey through the wilds of our contemporary lives. And we are also called to live up, as best we can, to Abraham’s apparent ability to transcend the dualism which suggests we are entirely separate from God. To hear, when our names are called, a doubled address that wakes us from complacency before offering a deep communication about who we really are.

    Trying to hold on simultaneously to the notion that I am distant from God (which is borne out in my ordinary reality, in which self-consciousness depends on awareness of the boundaries that separate me from everything other-than-me) and to the notion that I am always already in a state of devekut with God’s unity… well. It makes my brain hurt. I get that separation from God is necessary because it’s the act of moving to overcome the separation that makes us who and what we are — in that sense all of creation is an engine for teshuvah. But how can we live in boundaried reality, where duality is a necessary part of being, and in constant awareness that duality is illusory and all is One?

    Like most important tasks, I’m not sure the work of integrating those two perspectives can ever be said to be “finished.” Come to think of it, I’m not sure the kind of journey God invites Abraham (and, by extension, all of us) to take is ever “finished” either. Each one of us is always going forth from her land, the place of her birth, the house of her father. My land: the physical place where I feel at-home, the landscape I know intimately in every season, which in some sense I know best because I allow myself to leave and return. The place of my birth: my origin-point, physical and spiritual, the locus of my awakening. The house of my father: the interconnected web of my family, the community that shelters me and also allows me to reach beyond the limits of what’s familiar and known.

    Always leaving, always coming home. Our challenge is to fully inhabit the journey, to trust that we are being led forth for a reason, and to honor where we come from even as we relinquish attachment to who we’ve been. (And while we’re at it, to be gracious and hospitable to strangers, to argue for the rights of the inhabitants of even our most squalid cities, and to cultivate the discernment that will allow us to hear God’s call clearly.) Abraham’s not an easy role model, but his story has a lot to teach us about how to make our own lives a blessing. To sanctify the experience, and the process, of always going forth into something new.

    Reply
  12. Wendy

    Parshat Lech Lecha
    Torah Reading for Week of October 10 – October 16, 2010

    “Blessing and Transformation”
    by Tamar Frankiel, PhD
    AJRCA Dean of Academic Affairs and Professor of Comparative Religion
    “Go to the land that I will show you.” These famous lines of the Torah, telling Avram to leave everything behind and start anew guided only by G-d, have inspired the Jewish people throughout the ages.

    The Malbim (Rabbi Meir Leib ben Yechiel Michael Weiser, 1809-1879) interprets these words allegorically in his Shirei HaNefesh, a commentary on Shir HaShirim. The journey of Lech lecha is a saga of not merely historical import but also of the soul’s travel and travail. The soul is told to leave the heavens, “your birthplace, your Father’s house,” and go to a different land. According to Malbim, the blessings that Avram receives – I will bless you, I will make you a great nation, etc. – are like the seven blessings of a bride after which she makes a new life in a different world.

    The parsha is full of blessings. Not only is Avram blessed again by G-d, being given a covenant, a new name, and the promise of the land for his descendants, but also he is blessed by Melchizedek; and Sarah is separately blessed to be the mother of Yitzchak who will become the conduit for all these blessings to future generations.

    Melchizedek’s blessing is that of spiritual understanding, for he is a high priest. Sarah’s blessing is that of physical and emotional integration, for now their long union will bear its own fruit. The blessing that vouchsafes the land is an extension of Avram’s wealth, the ability to use the physical world to do G-d’s will.

    These parallel the capacities of the soul mentioned in the Shema, when we say “You shall love the Lord your G-d with all your heart, with all your life-force, and with all your resources.” The blessings of Avraham and Sarah resonate in this affirmation.

    Yet, “there is a famine in the land.” The soul comes into a world that is starving for spiritual nourishment. The desperate straits of the world are mirrored in Egypt, for Mitzrayim means “narrow straits.” In our story, the Pharaoh of Egypt threatens to separate Avram from Sarai – to destroy the soul’s potential for integration and wholeness.

    But G-d sends plagues on Pharaoh because of Sarah – literally, Rashi notes, “on a word of Sarai.” Standing strong in her devotion to the mission of the soul, her appeal to G-d overcomes the powers of separation.

    If Sarah, in this allegory, represents the physical and emotional dimensions of our being, we see that she represents a fully transformed being: a nefesh or vital life-force that has completely integrated the intention of the soul. This, according to Malbim is our goal: each individual must alchemically transform the relation between soul and body. The soul, being a part of G-d, already has the qualities of love, creativity, and dedication that are needed. The body, however, is designed for survival and tends to be egocentric and mistrusting. It must be transformed into a loving, giving being in order to transform the world.

    We have been given the blessings to accomplish this – not only from Avraham and Sarah, but from the long line of ancestors who have, as Malbim also points out, been stretched to the breaking-point many times, transformed themselves in the process, and changed the world. In their hearts, in their vitality, and with their resources they have remained true to our collective mission and passed that on to us.

    May we continue to be blessed on our souls’ journey of self-transformation, so that we, like our ancestors, may “be a blessing” for the future.

    Reply
  13. Aryae Post author

    From James Stone Goodman

    Lech Lecha – go, get thee out

    At the end of his life

    Abraham ascended to the top of the chariot of Ezekiel

    it was covered with the dew of light.

    Abraham dressed in hand-me-down celestial garments

    saw the future —

    a vision of reconciliation

    from what was missing in his generation

    he saw the implausible peace of his descendants.

    Something partial missing broken

    Chaser [Heb.]

    in Abraham’s generation

    that only the future could repair — [Zohar]

    the children of Abraham

    Isaac and Ishmael

    and all the Isaacs and Ishmaels

    of the future.

    We are the Isaacs and Ishmaels of the future.

    Go forth and make a path for your children [Genesis Rabbah
    40:6]

    From atop Ezekiel’s chariot

    Abraham saw and understood everything.

    Just as Abraham left his father’s house

    so all children leave their birth houses —

    Lech lecha [Genesis 12:1}

    get thee out

    out of your country

    and away from your kindred

    and away from your father’s house

    in ascending order of difficulty.

    All of us will have to leave our father’s house

    to make peace

    to step away from our comforts

    and inherited prejudices —

    because we can.

    jsg, usa

    James Stone Goodman
    check blog for new pieces
    http://www.stonegoodman.com/blog

    Reply
  14. Wendy

    From AJR/CA

    Parshat Lech Lecha
    Torah Reading for Week of October 30-November 5, 2011

    “Call him Ishmael”
    By Rabbi Janet Madden, PhD, ‘11

    “As his name, so is he.” (1 Samuel 25:25)

    In mathematics, transformation is the “mapping of one space onto another”; in linguistics, it is a rule that “systematically converts one form…into another.” But, no matter how we define it, transformation is a profound and multi-layered process that it is accomplished neither instantaneously nor easily.

    The divinely-uttered opening words of Parshat Lech Lecha that launch the radical transformations of Avram and Sarai can be understood in distinctly different ways, and they resonate with every person who has ever experienced the call to know oneself more deeply. The Izhbitzer Rebbe considers lech lecha the direction to Avram to learn who he is meant to be. Rabbi Shimshon Raphael Hirsch understands the word lecha as a call for isolation—Avram is to go by himself. And Avivah Zornberg believes that “the imperative of transformation” means that the leaving of one’s place is ultimately to “seek to become other.”

    In the parsha preceding Lech Lecha, Parshat Noah, Avram and Sarai are brought by Avram’s father from Ur to settle in Haran. But Avram, the ivri—the one who crosses over–is destined to continue as his own person the journey that he began as his father’s son. At age 75, Avram receives the divine command– “lech lecha.” And in their response to this call, Avram and Sarai demonstrate that we are never too old to be moved by the prospect that our lives can have greater meaning and that the divine challenge to engage in the complex and painful process of self-transformation is not obviated by age.

    Martin Buber proposes that “All journeys have secret destinations of which the traveler is unaware.” Thus, in spite of the divine promise that immediately follows the divine command, the essence of Parshat Lech Lecha is not the story of how easily the rewards for heeding G-d’s call come. Instead, Lech Lecha is a chronicle of unimagined internal and external struggles: in accepting the unknown risk inherent in going to and for oneself, Avram and Sarai encounter famine, wanderings, losses, estrangements, dangers and desperation. Twenty four years after embarking on their sojourn, G-d establishes a covenant with Avram and, in re-naming Sarah and Avraham, establishes that they have changed, that they have reached a milestone in their transformative process. But this is not the signal that their struggles have come to an end. Rather, this spiritual brit milah, which precedes the physical brit milah with which Lech Lecha closes, establishes a new beginning and presages not only the next stage of their journey but the journeys of Avraham’s two sons—the one who is to be the Other, Ishmael, and the one who is to be the inheritor of the brit, Isaac—and all of us who enter this world as their heirs.

    In perhaps the most famous first line of American literature, Herman Melville opens Moby Dick, his great novel of a transformative journey, with “Call me Ishmael.” In conceptualizing his narrator, Melville does not merely create a modern allusion to the archetypal outsider, the disinherited elder son. Like his Biblical namesake, Melville’s Ishmael powerfully embodies the human condition of aloneness, the uncomfortable reality of divinely-endowed difference, and the role of the Other in causing us to confront our deepest selves.

    Ishmael is the necessary reminder that inescapable pain lies at the heart of our urge to transformation. Pain, however, is tempered with hope. Ishmael, the “wild ass of a man,” is nonetheless divinely created, named and blessed. He, too, “will hear G-d.”

    Reply
  15. Wendy

    From Rabbi Gershon Winkler

    Buzzard: The Bird That Will Bring The Messiah

    A Teaching from Gershon…

    Listen. There is an eagle-like bird mentioned in the Torah among the birds we are forbidden to eat (Leviticus 11:18). It is a species of desert vulture known as רחםRoh’chom, which is Hebrew for compassion, because “when a Roh’chom flies overhead, it is an omen for heavenly compassion” (Talmud Bav’li, Chulin 63a). In later times, we called it a שרקרקSh’rak’rak because “rak rak” is the sound it makes when it sings. Moreover, taught the second-century Rabbi Bibi bar Abaye, “If ever a Roh’chom would chance to sit on the earth and sing, it is a sign that the Messiah has come אי יתיב אארעא ושריק אתא משיחא, as is written (in Zechariah 10:8), ‘Esh’rekah אשרקה[I shall shriek] for them and gather them, for I have redeemed them'” (Talmud Bav’li, Chulin 63a).

    Pretty wild. Basically, when this bird will one day swoop down from the skies above and alight upon the earth and go “rak rak”, it means the Messiah has come and redemption from all of our struggles is at hand. All my life I thought that the birth of a perfectly Red Cow summoned the advent of the Messianic happening. And here come the ancients rabbis once again and throw my entire Gestalt out of wack! Or should I say Quack! Forget the Red Cow. It’s gonna be a buzzard landing on the ground and going “rak rak.” Done deal.

    But a buzzard? Why not, say, a hummingbird, or a canary, or a colorful macaw, or any one of myriad species of nice, sweet gorgeous birds other than the one most notorious for feeding on dying animals?

    The first mention of the buzzard in the Torah appears in the account around Abraham’s covenantal vision (Genesis 15:9-14) which takes place during a three-day vision quest. On the first day, he gathers a heifer, a goat, a ram, a turtle-dove and a young dove. He splits in half the heifer, the goat, the ram, and the turtle-dove, but not the young dove, at which point a Spirit Fire wooshes through the middle, in between the animal halves. He is then visited by an עיטah’yeet, a species of buzzard. The buzzard gifts Abraham with the Breath of Life taken from the last breath of dying animals, with which Abraham then “restores” the parted animals back to life (11th-century Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki [Rashi]; 19th-century Rabbi Meir leibush in Mal’bim ahl HaTorah on Genesis 15:11).

    On the second day, Abraham is enveloped in a spirit of darkness and goes into a deep trance in which God communicates to Abraham that his descendants are destined to become strangers in a foreign land for a period of four hundred cycles, after which they will be redeemed, and after which they will exit their struggles with great bounty and return to their homeland. On the third day, he awakens from the trance and sees the remnants of the Spirit Fire that had passed earlier between the carcasses. In other words, it had not been a dream but it had actually happened in real life, real-time.

    Yes, I know. This version of the story is not the way you read it in the English translations. That is the flaw in available translations that I have been ranting about for decades.

    It is interesting to note that during the course of Abraham’s three-day vision quest, all three dramatic experiences — the splitting and restoration of the animal parts, the prophecy about his descendants, and the real-time evidence of the Spirit Fire – occur at nightfall (Genesis 15:5, 12 and 17). What is even more fascinating is that nightfall in ancient Hebrew is described throughout the Hebrew Scriptures as בא השמשbo ha’shemesh “coming of the Sun” (for example, Genesis 28:11, Exodus 17:12 and 22:25, Leviticus 22:7, Psalms 50:1 and 113:3, Ecclesiastes 1:5, Malachi 1:11, etc., etc., etc.) when one would suppose it ought to be “going of the Sun.” I mean, how would it sound to you if I told you that I will see you later tonight when the Sun comes?

    Obviously, as with so much else in the ancient language of our people, there is a deep deep lesson itching to emerge here. Simply put, the ancient Biblical Hebrew vocabulary has no such word as “Sunset” or “Sundown.” In later periods, we began to use the word שקיעהsh’key’ah – “sinking” – as in “sinking Sun”, but you will not find any such term employed throughout the more aboriginal vocabulary of our people. Because the Sun never goes down. It is always coming. You just have to wait out the night, but ultimately the Sun is coming, always coming, never going, never setting, never leaving. It is this mindset that has helped our people to last as long as we have. Regardless of how long and endless seemed the night, we always believed, always knew, that the Sun is coming. And this is why we are always directing ourselves toward the East. Not because Jerusalem is east of here. That’s too simplistic. No, we face East because we are always waiting for the Sun to come, for newness to break forth, for light to emerge from out of the darkness. And, as the prophet Isaiah told us some 2,700 years ago, the ah’yeet, that very same buzzard that visited Abraham during his vision quest and resurrected the halved animals, “is summoned from the East” (Isaiah 46:11), from the place of new beginnings, the place of shining, the place of hope. As a people, this has been our motto for two thousand years: “They can take away my sustenance (heifer), my power (ram), my tenacity (goat), even my old hope (turtle-dove), but they cannot take away my ever-renewing hope (young dove).”

    This is why Abraham did not split in half the young dove, the bird that symbolizes hope, the bird that brought to Noah a twig from an olive branch to restore hope to a world gone under. Why particularly a young dove? Because old hope grows stale after a while. It becomes routine. Our people is still praying for the opportunity to return to our homeland when the homeland is still waiting for us to return. Our people is still praying for a little respite from oppression when we haven’t been oppressed in decades. Old hopes become stale when they put us to sleep and prevent us from recognizing the realization of those hopes. We need new hope, or at least renewed hope.

    So, yeah, the Messianic happening being announced by a buzzard makes all the sense in the world. She carries the life breath of struggle. And when she will alight from the heavens and perch herself upon the earth to restore within us what has become fragmented, we will know that the Messiah is here. She will perform this restoration by singing her song with the very breath of struggle that we had sighed in each of those moments of challenge in our lives, of hardship. As Moses once prayed: “Gladden us commensurate with the days of our misfortunes, those many years during which we witnessed evil” (Psalms 90:15). For, when the Sun comes, all of our grief will be transformed into dance (Psalms 30:12), our weeping into song (Psalms 126:5), and every sigh you ever breathed will be breathed back into you, albeit as a breath of renewed life and joy.

    “Rak Rak!”

    Reply
  16. Wendy

    From Rabbi Rachel Barenblat

    Becoming Avraham: on names and transformation in Lech-Lecha
    Posted: 09 Oct 2013 07:51 AM PDT
    When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the Lord appeared to Abram and said to him, “I am El Shaddai. Walk in My ways and be blameless. I will establish My covenant between Me and you, and I will make you exceedingly numerous.”

    Abram threw himself on his face; and God spoke to him further, “As for Me, this is My covenant with you: You shall be the father of a multitude of nations. And you shall no longer be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham, for I make you the father of a multitude of nations. (Genesis 17:1-5; parashat Lech Lecha.)

    Many years ago, a dear friend set out to read the Bible because she felt — I think rightly — that it had had a tremendous influence on English-language literature. She chose the King James version, both because she felt it had had the most impact on English lit and because she doesn’t speak Hebrew. As she began to work her way through Genesis, and came to this passage, she asked me: what’s this name change about? What does it mean?

    Most simply, the change from Avram to Avraham involves the addition of one letter: ה, the “h” sound. (We pronounce the name of this letter as heh or hei.) Sarai’s name is also changed this week, in a similar way: the י at the end of the name Sarai is changed to the ה at the end of Sarah.

    The letter ה is one of our ways of denoting God. ה’ means HaShem, “The Name,” e.g. the Holy One of Blessing. Some sources in our tradition read the added ה as a symbol of God’s presence. Avram becomes Avraham; Sarai becomes Sarah; in both cases, the added letter signifies God. Other sources relate the letter ה to breath (certainly that is how the letter sounds when vocalized), and — remembering that God breathed the breath of life into the first human only a few weeks ago in our narrative — see the added ה as a sign of divine spirit.

    A change in name can signal a change in destiny. Avraham and Sarah aren’t the only ones in Torah to receive new names from God; later in our story we’ll encounter Jacob, “the Heel” (his name comes from the word for heel, as he grabbed his twin brother’s heel in the womb to ensure that he himself would be born first — and sure enough, Jacob is kind of a heel as the English colloquial usage would have it!) who wrestles with an angel and becomes Yisrael, “Wrestles-With-God.”

    An interesting note: the Torah tells us that God said to Avram “Your name shall be Avraham,” but of Sarai God says “her name is Sarah.” Not “shall be,” but already is. We read in Talmud:

    Rabbi Huna said, quoting Rabbi Acha: The letter yud which was removed from Sarai’s name was divided into two letters; one hei was added to Abram and the other to Sarah.” (Talmud Yerushalmi, Sanhedrin 2:6)

    Remember that in Hebrew, numbers and letters are the same thing. The letter י equals the number 10; the letter ה equals the number 5. According to this reading, the 10 in Sarai’s name was removed and broken into two 5s, two הs; one ה was attached to each name. In this reading, it was Sarai’s deep spirituality which was divided and shared between the two of them — or perhaps her spirituality which made it possible for both of them to experience this added gift of spirit and awareness.

    The Zohar offers a different interpretation. Zohar teaches that the ה — meaning 5 — represents the 5 books of Moses, e.g. the Torah. As a prooftext, the Zohar offers a creative re-reading of Genesis 2:4:

    “These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created [in Hebrew, “beheibaram”] in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.” He made them with [the letter] hei /ה.

    The Zohar deconstructs the word “beheibaram” (“when they were created”) into b’ (which means “with”) hei (“the letter ה”) baram (“they were created.”) The simple surface meaning of “when they were created” is re-interpreted into “The heavens and the earth were created with ה.” Remember that the letter ה, which can also mean 5, represents Torah — so this teaches us that (in the Zohar’s opinion) the whole of creation was created by means of the Torah. That’s what Avram and Sarai inherited at this moment of blessing and name change: they inherited Torah, which in a deep mystical sense is the blueprint for all of creation.

    Jewish tradition places deep importance on names. There’s an old saying that when parents name our children, we experience a frisson of prophecy, since in giving a child a name we create some of that child’s destiny. And you’ve probably heard of (and perhaps even experienced) the old custom of changing someone’s name if they are very ill. The folk tradition says it’s to fool the Angel of Death, but I think it also has to do with a deep and inchoate sense that when someone’s name changes, new possibilities are opened up. (I have many friends in Jewish Renewal who have changed their names, or taken on second Hebrew names, at moments of great personal transformation in their lives for this reason.)

    It’s worth noting that in the passage I quoted at the start of this d’var Torah, God introduces God’s-self as El Shaddai. (Remember that God has many names in Jewish tradition — even just in the Torah itself.) This name can be understood to be related to the Hebrew root which means breasts, so it can be read as a name of divine mothering and compassion. Can we imagine that in the ה which our ancestors received here was some of that motherly compassion and kindness?

    At the start of this week’s portion, God commands Avram “Lech-lecha” — go you forth, or as many of us translate it, go forth into yourself. Maybe it’s only once Avram has gone forth into himself — once he has done the inner work of self-discovery and discernment — that he becomes ready to receive the changed name which implies a deeper awareness of God’s presence, a deeper connection to spirit and soul, a deeper connection to motherly kindness and compassion, a deeper connection to Torah… which he can then pass down to all of us. Kein yehi ratzon, may it be so!

    Reply
  17. Wendy

    From Rabbi Laura Duhan Kaplan

    Lech-Lecha
    Three Ways to Find God (2013/5774)

    When the Torah introduces Noah, it explains why God singled him out for a special task. “Noah was a righteous person in his generation.” But when the Torah introduces Avram, no such explanation is given. We know only a bit about his genealogy. Why the omission?

    Midrash Genesis Rabbah (39:1) suggests the omission is deliberate. God did not choose Avram; rather Avram chose to tune in to God’s message. Normally, the midrash suggests, God seems hidden inside a fortress. Even avid theists may meet only traces of God, through natural beauty or surprising kindness in stressful times. Avram saw those traces and wanted more. He was awed by the beauty of the world and thought, “How can anyone say no one is in charge?” He became outraged about the world’s problems and thought, “Surely, someone ought to be in charge here!” Because of Avram’s urgent questions, the Holy One appeared to him.

    But perhaps Torah does not omit the explanation; rather, the genealogy is itself the explanation. At first, we know only that Avram’s father and brother have died, and that Avram and his wife Sarai have no children. Suddenly Avram hears God say, “Leave your father’s house.” Perhaps a heavy-hearted Avram felt a void of grief, as if through multiple family losses his father’s house had already left him. Moving out of the emptiness, he found a companion: God’s voice. He found a direction: forward. He found a meaning: the promise of future blessing.

    Whether we find God through awe, outrage, or grief, may we all find our companions as we move forward towards the promise of future blessing.

    Reply
  18. Wendy

    From Rav Kook

    Lech Lecha: Malkhi-tzedek and Abraham

    After Abraham defeated Chedarla’omer and his allied kings, he was greeted by Malkhi-tzedek, the priest-king of Jerusalem:

    “Malkhi-tzedek, king of Salem, brought forth bread and wine. He was a priest to God, the Most High.” (Gen. 14:18)
    Who was Malkhi-tzedek? What is the significance of this encounter?

    Shem Loses the Priesthood

    The Sages identified the priest-king of Salem as Shem, the son of Noah. With his ill-fated greeting of Abraham, however, Shem forever lost the priesthood.

    “The Holy One wanted the priesthood to originate from Shem. But when Shem blessed Abraham before he blessed God, the priesthood was transferred to Abraham. Abraham asked: “Is it proper to bless the servant before blessing his Master?” God immediately gave the priesthood to Abraham. …
    “That is what is written, “He was a priest to God.” He [Malkhi-tzedek] was a priest, but his descendants were not.” (Nedarim 32b)
    This transfer of the priesthood is deeply significant, as it contrasts the different approaches of these two great individuals, Shem and Abraham.

    Shem was called Malkhi-tzedek, literally, “the just king.” He stressed the trait of tzedek — justice and worthiness. Abraham, on the hand, excelled in chesed and kindness. He sought to reach out to others, to influence and help them even beyond what they deserved.

    Shem emphasized God’s quality of transcendence. He was a priest “to God, the Most High.” His God was exalted far beyond the realm of humanity. Finite and insignificant, we cannot begin to emulate God, and Godliness cannot directly influence us. For Shem, in order to approach God it is necessary to choose a worthy intermediary. Therefore, the text emphasizes that only he was a priest. Only a holy individual of Shem’s stature could serve as a bridge between God and His creatures. Since Shem’s descendants did not attain the necessary spiritual level, they were unable to inherit Shem’s priesthood.

    The Inclusive Priesthood of Abraham

    The Torah, on the other hand, views every individual as a being created in God’s image. We all are capable of connecting with our Creator. What then is the function of the kohen (priest)? The kohen not an intermediary, but rather atones for and purifies the people, enabling them to approach God directly. This form of priesthood could only originate from Abraham, from his attribute of chesed and sincere desire to help others.

    Abraham developed his special trait of chesed through the two mitzvot mentioned in the Torah portion: brit milah (circumcision), and settling the Land of Israel. Both commandments strengthened his connection with future generations — “This is My covenant that you must keep, between Me and you and your descendants” (Gen. 17:10). They enabled Abraham to focus on his primary goal: concern for others and preparing the way for future generations.

    In general, mitzvot serve to connect and unite. The word mitzvah comes from the root tzevet, meaning ‘togetherness’ or ‘team.’ The mitzvot focused Abraham’s lifework towards the future community of his descendants, and through them, to the entire world.

    Abraham’s Altar

    A careful reading of the text reveals a major shift that occurred in Abraham’s service of God. When Abraham first arrived in the Land of Israel, he built an altar and dedicated it “to God Who appeared to him” (Gen. 12:7). This dedication expressed Abraham’s gratitude for his own personal spiritual attainments. “To God who appeared to him” — just to Abraham, the holy prophet in his own private spiritual world.

    After fulfilling God’s command and traveling through the Land, Abraham returned to the altar he had built. This time, however, Abraham “called out in God’s Name” (Gen. 13:4). As Maimonides explained,

    “The people would gather around him and question him about his words, and he would explain to each one according to his capabilities” (Laws of Idolatry 1:13).
    Now Abraham “called out in God’s Name.” He publicized the belief in one God. This reflects the essence of Abraham’s new prophetic mission: reaching out to others in God’s Name.

    Shem/Malkhi-tzedek, on the other hand, remained on the level of tzedek, without a public calling. “He was a priest to God.” He was a priest, but not the priest. Lacking the definitive article, the prefix letter hey, Shem was only a priest for himself, without a connection to others. Instead, the letter hey was added to Abraham’s name, indicating the universal nature of his mission. From Avram he became Avraham — “Av hamon goyim,” the father of many nations — bringing the entire world closer to God.

    “God has sworn and will not retract: you are a priest forever, due to the words of Malkhi-tzedek.” (Psalms 110:4)
    (Adapted from Shemu’ot HaRe’iyah 8: Lech Lecha 5690 (1929))

    Copyright © 2006 by Chanan Morrison

    Reply
  19. Wendy

    From Melissa Carpenter

    Lekh-lekha: Cutting a Covenant

    The first three covenants God makes with human beings in the Torah are unconditional; God promises to do something regardless of what the other party does. First God says to Noah:

    Everything on earth will perish, but I will raise up my berit with you, and you shall come into the ark… (Genesis/Bereishit 6:18)

    berit (בְּרִית) = covenant, pact, treaty of alliance. (This is the source of the Yiddish word bris = covenant of circumcision.)

    After the flood, God tells Noah and his descendants not to eat the blood in animal meat, and not to shed the blood of humans. Then God declares a covenant with all future humans and animals on earth—without making it contingent on humans following the rules about blood.

    And I, here I am, raising up my berit with you and with your descendants after you, and with every living creature that is with you—with birds, with beasts, and with everything living on the earth with you …I raise up my berit with you, and I will not cut off all flesh again by the waters of the flood, and never again will there be a flood to destroy the earth. (Genesis 9:9-11)

    God makes a third, and last, unconditional covenant in this week’s Torah portion, Lekh-lekha (“Get yourself going!”).

    Abraham hears God’s call at age 75, leaves his home in Aram, and travels to Canaan, where he is landless and childless (though he has a wife, a nephew, and a large number of men working for him). God promises Abraham three times that he will have a whole nation of descendants, from his own loins, and they will possess the land of Canaan.

    Abraham-looks-at-starsThe third time, Abraham points out that he is still childless. God shows him the stars, and says his descendants will be just as numerous. The sight of the stars moves Abraham, and he trusts God on this. Then God repeats that Abraham will possess the land of Canaan, and Abraham questions God again:

    God, my master, how will I know that I will take possession of it? (Genesis 15:8)

    God responds by changing the promise into a covenant. And since words alone do not seem to be enough for Abraham any more, God does not just “raise up” or establish a covenant through words, but “cuts” a covenant in a ritual used for centuries among ancient people in the Middle East, including Akkadians, Amorites, Hittites, Assyrians, and Arameans as well as Israelites.

    In this ritual, two parties ratified a pact or treaty by slaughtering one or more animals and cutting each one in half. Surviving written documents include threats that if one of the parties does not uphold the agreement, he will be cut in half like the animal.

    At some point, Israelites added a step to the ritual: after an animal was cut in two, someone walked between the pieces.

    …the berit that they cut before Me: the calf that they cut in two and they passed between its pieces: the officers of Judah, and the officers of Jerusalem, the court officials, and the priests, and all the people of the land, the ones who passed between the pieces of the calf …(Jeremiah 34:18-19)

    In this week’s Torah portion, God requests five animals, from the five species that are used later in the Torah for burnt offerings.

    Take for me a three-year-old heifer and a three-year-old she-goat and a three-year-old ram and a turtledove and a young pigeon. And he took for [God] all these, and he cut them through the middle, and set each part opposite its fellow. But the birds he did not cut. (Genesis 9-10)

    The 20th-century Rabbi Meir Zlotowitz claimed that Abraham placed the two uncut birds opposite one another, completing the path between the pieces. And God grants him a vision.

    And the sun had set, and darkness happened, and hey!—a smoking tanur and a torch of fire, which passed between these cut pieces. On that day, God cut with Abraham a berit, saying: To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt up to the great river, the river Euphrates. (Genesis 15:17-18)

    tanur (תַנּוּר) = fire-pot, brazier, oven, furnace.

    In the books of Exodus and Deuteronomy, God’s presence is often described in terms of smoke and fire. But imagine a disembodied smudge-pot and a torch passing between the pieces!

    When God and Abraham cut a covenant, it is God who walks between the pieces.
    This is God’s last unilateral covenant in the Hebrew Bible. The next covenant between God and Abraham, at the end of this week’s Torah portion, is conditional; God will multiply Abraham’s descendants if and only if every male in Abraham’s household is circumcised.

    After that, covenants between God and humans are like Biblical covenants between two humans: the party with more power promises to protect the party with less power, on the condition that the weaker party remains loyal to his superior and follows the stipulated rules. In God’s case, people must obey various laws, observe holy days, and/or refrain from worshiping other gods as a condition for God’s favor and protection.

    Why does God switch to conditional covenants? I think God is frustrated by what happens right after God cuts a covenant with Abraham. His post-menopausal wife, Sarah, gives him her slave Hagar to produce a son for him; and instead of continuing to wait for a miraculous birth, Abraham cooperates. But God seems disappointed, and makes a new covenant with Abraham. Besides requiring circumcision as a condition, God specifies that Sarah must be the mother of the son who inherits the covenant, and says: I will bless her, and also give you a son from her. (Genesis 17:16)

    From then on, God apparently does not trust humans to make their own arrangements without at least a few divine rules to guide them.

    Today people make many conditional contracts with each other: for rent, for employment, for services. Some people also try to bargain with God, promising to do something they think God wants in exchange for a divine favor—as if God could be bribed.

    There is also a widespread unconditional covenant between human beings today: marriage. Our wedding rituals can be elaborate (though they do not feature cutting up animals and walking between the pieces). But at the heart of the ceremony, each person promises to be with and support the other (like God promising to favor and protect someone), regardless of what happens.

    Today, Jewish circumcision is more like an unconditional covenant with God. Infant boys are dedicated to the God of Israel through circumcision with no expectation that God will grant them fertility or any special favors in return.

    But can you imagine God initiating a covenant with a human being today? Can you imagine God raising up or cutting a covenant with you?

    What would it be like? Has it already happened, in some subtle way?

    Reply
  20. Wendy

    From Bob Jaffe

    A little drash on Trees in the Torah

    We begin the Bible story in a Garden of Trees, all kinds of trees, trees of the Earth; and we are of the Trees, joined with the Trees as if we were kin. There are two special trees in the Center; one is the Tree of Life and the other is the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.This one is special and we are told not to eat its fruit lest we lose sight of the Forest; and then we would only see its individual trees, each one alone and separate; and we, alone and separated, no longer kin of the Forest.

    We are destined to eat the fruit, of course; there is no turning back from desire.

    Once we eat of the fruit, we awaken from the Dream of Unity and find ourselves bereft of the Garden. And so begins our Journey to find this lost Garden. We pass from the East and journey into Canaan. Almost by miracle there is a tree waiting for us as we cross over into Canaan; this is the Terebinth of Moreh and it is called the Tree of Learning. This is where Abraham will have his first encounter with God. No accident the Tree of Learning in our pathway; this is where we really begin the raw story… to learn from the Tree what it has to teach us, about Life, about this lost vision of ourselves as part of the Unity, trial and error, pain and suffering, no easy way out. In ancient times, before the Bible stories, trees were thought to be Teachers, prophets..perhaps an echo of this lost Garden, a yearning for this lost Vision; maybe that is why teachers and their students would sit under trees as they studied and learned.

    There is much to learn from Trees; they are the source of the air we breathe, we are the source of the air they breathe. Quite a partnership, inescapable, one would say that we are part of the Unity, at one with them. Each tree teaches us this living reminder of the Lost Garden… of this precious experience and vision. We must protect the trees; they are the way Back.

    Reply
  21. Wendy

    From Rabbi Rami Shapiro

    If Judaism is what it says it is

    If Judaism is what it says it is, namely the one true revelation of the one true and only God given to God’s Chosen for the benefit of all humanity, then Judaism matters, and matters supremely. If Judaism is merely an artifact marking the Jews’ romanticized history and cataloging their diverse expressions of literary, cultic, and spiritual creativity it still matters, but only to Jews. And fewer and fewer Jews at that.

    Only a fraction of Jews believe Judaism is what it says it is. I am not one of them. And while the vast majority of Jews believe Judaism is an artifact of Jewish culture, most of them are indifferent to it. I am not one of them either.

    I am in search of an alternative, one that admits Judaism isn’t true, and yet refuses to reduce Judaism to a tribal fetish and ancestor worship. For me Judaism isn’t a product but a process; it isn’t an inherited set of meanings and values, but a way of creating meaning and value rooted in iconoclasm, argument, and doubt.

    Here is the process Judaism set forth in Genesis 12:1-3:

    YHVH said to Avram, “Go forth (Lech lecha) from your country, your people, and your parents’ home to the land I will show you. I will make of you a great people, and I will bless you. I will spread your good reputation and you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and curse those who curse you. And all the families of the earth will be blessed because of you.”

    The Hebrew lech lecha implies both an outer and an inner journey: lech/walk lecha/toward your self. Those who follow this command are called to free themselves both physically and psychologically from the constraints and conditioning of nationalism, culture, and parental bias. To these I would add all other isms and ideologies—race, creed, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etc. Only when you are free from all these distortions can you see the land God wishes to show you; the land you see when your vision is cleansed from all conditioned thought and feelings. It is only then that you become great and live as a blessing to all the families of the earth.

    Those who bless you are those fellow travellers who also seek to see without distortion. Those who curse you are those who cling to their blinders with a passion too often verging on and crossing over into the murderous.

    Judaism, then, is neither the one true religion, nor a jumble of cultural artifacts. Judaism is a process of liberating oneself from all fixed ideas and fetishes so that we can be a blessing to all the families of the earth.

    Reply
  22. Wendy

    From Dr Tamar Frankiel

    “Blessing and Transformation”

    “Go to the land that I will show you.” These famous lines of the Torah, telling Avram to leave everything behind and start anew guided only by G-d, have inspired the Jewish people throughout the ages.
    The Malbim (Rabbi Meir Leib ben Yechiel Michael Weiser, 1809-1879) interprets these words allegorically in his Shirei HaNefesh, a commentary on Shir HaShirim. The journey of Lech lecha is a saga of not merely historical import but also of the soul’s travel and travail. The soul is told to leave the heavens, “your birthplace, your Father’s house,” and go to a different land. According to Malbim, the blessings that Avram receives – I will bless you, I will make you a great nation, etc. – are like the seven blessings of a bride after which she makes a new life in a different world.
    The parsha is full of blessings. Not only is Avram blessed again by G-d, being given a covenant, a new name, and the promise of the land for his descendants, but also he is blessed by Melchizedek; and Sarah is separately blessed to be the mother of Yitzchak who will become the conduit for all these blessings to future generations.
    Melchizedek’s blessing is that of spiritual understanding, for he is a high priest. Sarah’s blessing is that of physical and emotional integration, for now their long union will bear its own fruit. The blessing that vouchsafes the land is an extension of Avram’s wealth, the ability to use the physical world to do G-d’s will.
    These parallel the capacities of the soul mentioned in the Shema, when we say “You shall love the Lord your G-d with all your heart, with all your life-force, and with all your resources.” The blessings of Avraham and Sarah resonate in this affirmation.
    Yet, “there is a famine in the land.” The soul comes into a world that is starving for spiritual nourishment. The desperate straits of the world are mirrored in Egypt, for Mitzrayim means “narrow straits.” In our story, the Pharaoh of Egypt threatens to separate Avram from Sarai – to destroy the soul’s potential for integration and wholeness.
    But G-d sends plagues on Pharaoh because of Sarah – literally, Rashi notes, “on a word of Sarai.” Standing strong in her devotion to the mission of the soul, her appeal to G-d overcomes the powers of separation.
    If Sarah, in this allegory, represents the physical and emotional dimensions of our being, we see that she represents a fully transformed being: a nefesh or vital life-force that has completely integrated the intention of the soul. This, according to Malbim is our goal: each individual must alchemically transform the relation between soul and body. The soul, being a part of G-d, already has the qualities of love, creativity, and dedication that are needed. The body, however, is designed for survival and tends to be egocentric and mistrusting. It must be transformed into a loving, giving being in order to transform the world.
    We have been given the blessings to accomplish this – not only from Avraham and Sarah, but from the long line of ancestors who have, as Malbim also points out, been stretched to the breaking-point many times, transformed themselves in the process, and changed the world. In their hearts, in their vitality, and with their resources they have remained true to our collective mission and passed that on to us.
    May we continue to be blessed on our souls’ journey of self-transformation, so that we, like our ancestors, may “be a blessing” for the future.
    – See more at: https://ajrca.edu/parshat-lech-lecha-7/#sthash.wTBENxL2.dpuf

    Reply
  23. Wendy

    From Rabbi David Kasher

    THEN AND THEN – Parshat Lech-Lecha
    Here is a verse, said Spinoza, that shakes the very foundations of Jewish theology:

    Abram passed through the land up to the place of Shechem, at Alon Moreh – and the Canaanites were then in the land. (Gen. 12:6)

    וַיַּעֲבֹר אַבְרָם, בָּאָרֶץ, עַד מְקוֹם שְׁכֶם, עַד אֵלוֹן מוֹרֶה; וְהַכְּנַעֲנִי, אָז בָּאָרֶץ

    Wait…was that it? Abraham’s travel itinerary – what’s the the big deal?

    Yet this seemingly benign verse, detailing the first steps on the journey Abraham took after God’s famous charge to “Go forth!”, was one of the prime examples given by the great Dutch philosopher – and most illustrious of Jewish heretics – Baruch Spinoza, to prove that the Torah could not have been written by Moses through divine revelation. And that premise, that Moses received the Torah – every word of it – from God on Mount Sinai, is perhaps the faith principle upon which the whole of classical rabbinic theology rests.

    So what exactly is the problem with the verse in question? It doesn’t even mention God – or miracles, or morality, or anything controversial. What could be wrong?

    The great challenge, it seems, is to be found in the phrase, “and the Canaanites were then in the land,” and in particular, with the past tense. Because it sounds like the line is written by someone who lives at a time when the Canaanites are no longer in the land. They were there then, but they are not there anymore. But here’s the difficulty: Moses presumably wrote the Torah when the Canaanites were still very much in the land, since the story of Moses leading the Children of Israel through the desert culminates in their entering the land to conquer those very Canaanites.

    And so, concludes Spinoza, Moses could not have written the Torah. At least not this verse. It must have been inserted later, by someone referring back to Moses’ time. And if this line was cut and pasted, who knows what else was edited in or out? More to the point, even if we were to accept that there was a divine revelation, who knows what counts as divine revelation and what is just human addition? The whole notion of a perfect, sacred text has been undermined.

    And yet, this Baruch Spinoza wasn’t just some angry atheist on a rant. He was a nice, Jewish boy – and he knew his Torah. So he didn’t claim that he had come up with this critique on his own; he grounded it in the sources. In fact (in in a chapter of his Tractatus Theologico-Politicus entitled “On The Interpretation of Scripture” – or in other words, “parshanut”), he cites none other than Abraham Ibn Ezra, one of the greatest of the classical medieval commentators, as the person who first pointed out this same difficulty with our verse.

    So here is Ibn Ezra, in his own words:

    and the Canaanites were then in the land – It is possible that the Land of Canaan was captured by the Canaanites just after Abraham got there.

    והכנעני אז בארץ. יתכן שארץ כנען תפשה כנען מיד אחר

    Okay, that is his first answer. Maybe it means that, it just so happens, that at the very moment Abraham was crossing through into the land, just then, the Canaanites were conquering it. But Ibn Ezra doesn’t seem satisfied with that, and so he goes on:

    And if that is not the case, then there is a secret here. But the one who understands it, should remain silent.

    ואם איננו כן יש לו סוד והמשכיל ידום

    Well. Now, that’s intriguing. A secret? Spinoza was right, there’s something going on here! But could it really be that pious Ibn Ezra, in the 12th century, was saying the same thing that Spinoza, the Enlightenment heretic, would later claim – that this verse was inserted, centuries later, by some post-Mosaic author?

    Indeed, it seems so, for in his comments on another verse, in Deuteronomy (1:1), which also seems like it could have been written after Moses’ time, Ibn Ezra again refers to a “secret,” and says that if you understand it “then you will recognize the truth.” (תכיר האמת). Perhaps the only difference is that Ibn Ezra thought this ought to be kept “secret,” for the good of the faith, whereas Spinoza was finally willing to expose the Torah’s imperfections to the world.

    So Spinoza takes Ibn Ezra to be the proto-Biblical critic, one of the earliest Jewish voices to really admit that the whole Torah was not the word of God. Now, to be fair, Ibn Ezra was only talking about a few verses, here and there, and not some massive editing project, pulling together scraps from various documents. Moreover, other comments of the Ibn Ezra’s clearly indicate that he was a believer in a Mosaic moment of divine revelation. Nevertheless, he does seem to allow for a historical analysis of the text that would chip away at that revelation. And once we allow people to start chipping at the divinity of the Torah, who knows if anything will be left when they are through. It’s no wonder Ibn Ezra wanted to keep things quiet.

    Now there are many other interpretations of this verse, various attempts to read the grammar this way or that. But the one I am most interested in, for the purpose of contrast, is Rashi’s, not only because he is the other of the two greatest medieval commentators, but also because his interpretive approach is often the exact opposite of Ibn Ezra’s, in that it is distinctly ahistorical – even, in a way, anti-historical. That is, he does not read the Torah in the light of what we now know from history, but instead, reads the narrative of the Torah as having laws of its own, that can even transgress the laws of history.

    What do I mean? Well, let’s take a look at Rashi’s comments on the verse. First, he is interested in why Abraham is journeying to precisely these places. Why mention Shechem? Why Alon Moreh?

    Up to the place of Shechem – In order to pray for the Children of Jacob, when they would eventually go and do battle in Shechem.

    עד מקום שכם – להתפלל על בני יעקב כשיבאו להלחם בשכם

    Alon Moreh – Which is also in Shechem, and he was shown Mount Gerizim and Mount Eival, where Israel accepted the Oath of the Torah.

    אלון מורה – הוא שכם, הראהו הר גריזים והר עיבל ששם קבלו ישראל שבועת התורה

    According to Rashi, Abraham is taking a tour forward in time, scanning the land not just for what is there now, but what will be there one day. For Shechem is, indeed, a city in which Jacob’s children will wage a bloody battle, later (in Genesis Ch. 34). And Alon Moreh is another place mentioned later, in the Book of Deuteronomy (Ch. 11), and said to be near where the Nation of Israel took an oath on Mount Gerizim and Mount Eival. So before even thinking about how those later mentions might hearken back to Abraham’s journey, Rashi already sees Abraham gazing forward, into the future, to see how his descendants will fare in this same land. The connection between the place names gives Rashi license to imagine the two moments in time as connected – and a portal opens between them, through which one can move in either direction. The language of the Torah defines the logic of the universe.

    Now what is interesting, given the rest of the verse, is that at the that Moses and the Children of Israel were taking oaths at Alon Moreh, the Canaanites were in the land. So reading the verse through Rashi’s suggestion that Abraham was looking into the future, from Abraham’s perspective the Canaanites were in the land during the scene he was witnessing.

    “Now wait a minute,” you grammarians out there will shout. “That’s very nice metaphysical trick you’ve played. But remember – the verse is in the past tense! That was the whole point! ‘The Canaanites were then in the land.’ Abraham cannot be seeing something that will happen and reflecting on it as something that already has happened.”

    And yet, there is a solution to this contradiction. For here is the truly dizzying thing about the verse: the word for ‘then’ in Hebrew – az (אז) – can refer to either the past or the future. I’m not making this up. The Brown, Driver, Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament – a standard-bearer for Biblical semantics – has these as the first two usage definitions for ‘az’:

    az (אז) – then… an adverb, a. Of past time, or, b. Of future time.

    …and then they give many examples of each usage.

    And this is not so strange as it might first sound to the reader, for in English, too, the word then can point forward or backward: “We did it then.” “We will do it then.” So too, the phrase “And the Canaanite was then in the land,” could also be read “And the Canaanite will then be in the land.”

    So, again following Rashi’s transhistorical reading of the journey, Abraham went to Shechem, saw his great-grandchildren fighting and prayed for them. And then he went to visit Alon Moreh, and there were his descendants, now a whole people, accepting the oath of the Torah as they prepared to enter the land. And then he saw, as he peered through this window into the future, that the Canaanites would then be in the land. And then he knew, already in the first moments after hearing God’s command, everything about how that command would echo through the generations. He could see the Torah straight through to the end.

    Now, to be clear, that’s not how the Brown-Driver-Briggs Lexicon reads this verse. They place this usage of ‘az’ in the first category, referring to past time. As did the Ibn Ezra did, as did Spinoza. Even Rashi, even after his time-traveling interpretations, does not suggest that perhaps Abraham saw that “the Canaanite will be then in the land.”

    But I, who sympathize with both the historian and the theologian, both the heretic and the mystic, have offered these possibilities here because the indeterminacy of it all appeals to me. I like that the very word with which some would prove the Torah wrong could also be the word which lends the Torah transcendent metaphysical power. I like that the language of Torah is vague enough, capacious enough, pregnant enough, as to offer us two readings which contradict each other in every conceivable way, and are nevertheless both technically correct. For what is this Torah supposed to be, if not infinite?

    Reply
  24. Wendy

    From Rabbi David Kasher

    DESTINED TO DOUBT – Parshat Lech Lecha
    There once was a man who carved grooves in time.

    Everything he did imprinted itself onto existence, and the traces of those imprints would reappear in every generation. Everywhere he went, a path was created behind him, and those who came after him would find themselves walking that same path, falling into his footsteps, without even knowing what they were doing.

    That man was born with the name Avram. But the Lord called him Abraham.

    This week, in Parshat Lech-Lecha, we begin his story.

    Now, there are some parshot in the Torah that one just should not read without the wisdom of a particular commentator. For Lech-Lecha, the 13th-century commentary of Nachmanides is the must-see. In particular, there is one piece of his that I think about every year – a piece that can change the way we read the whole narrative of the Torah.

    Nachmanides points out something obvious to anyone who reads through Genesis and Exodus – that just as Abraham goes down to Egypt, so too will the Children of Israel one day go down to Egypt. But what he says about that repetition is startling:

    I will tell you a principle that you must understand throughout all the upcoming stories of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It is a great concept that our rabbis articulated in brief language. They said (in Midrash Tanchuma 9:3):

    ‘Everything that happens to the parents is a sign for the children.’

    So when the Torah goes on and on with the stories of the journeys they took, or the wells they dug, or the other events of their lives, one might think these are unnecessary details, which have no meaning. But all of them are meant to teach us about the future. For when something happens to one of the three forefathers, we can understand from it that something has been decreed upon his offspring.

    אומר לך כלל תבין אותו בכל הפרשיות הבאות בענין אברהם יצחק ויעקב והוא ענין גדול הזכירוהו רבותינו בדרך קצרה ואמרו(תנחומא ט׳) כל מה שאירע לאבות סימן לבנים ולכן יאריכו הכתובים בספור המסעות וחפירת הבארות ושאר המקרים ויחשוב החושב בהם כאלו הם דברים מיותרים אין בהם תועלת וכולם באים ללמד על העתיד כי כאשר יבוא המקרה לנביא משלשת האבות יתבונן ממנו הדבר הנגזר לבא לזרעו

    Nachmanides central asssertion here, borrowed from an earlier midrash, became so well-known that it formed a traditional saying: “Maaseh avot siman l’banim.” (מעשה אבות סימן לבנים): “The actions of the parents is a sign for the children.” But what does that mean, ‘a sign’? Is it just that we tend to replay the patterns set by our families? That much any psychologist will tell you is true.

    Nachmanides seems to be saying more: that in the case of Abraham, those patterns are set not just behaviorally, culturally, or psychologically – but metaphysically. Whatever he did somehow shaped the very contours of reality, so that everyone who came after him was destined to retrace the arc of his journey.

    Abraham carved grooves in time. And his descendants keep falling into those grooves, like a needle falls into the groove of a record that plays over and over, echoing throughout the universe, forever.

    Whether or not you believe the metaphysical claim here, from a literary perspective, Nachmanides’ principle does a good job of accounting for the way that many of the narrative themes running through Exodus seem to be seeded in this week’s parsha.

    Look at how much is “foretold,” for example, in just a few lines from Chapters 12 and 13:

    Chapter 12, verse 10:

    There was a famine in the land, and Avram went down to Egypt…

    וַיְהִי רָעָב, בָּאָרֶץ; וַיֵּרֶד אַבְרָם מִצְרַיְמָה…

    …just as another famine in the same region later compels Jacob’s sons to journey down to Egypt to find sustenance. (Gen. 42)

    Verses 14 &15:

    When Avram entered Egypt, the Egyptians saw how very beautiful [Sarai] was…and the woman was taken into Pharaoh’s palace.

    וַיְהִי, כְּבוֹא אַבְרָם מִצְרָיְמָה; וַיִּרְאוּ הַמִּצְרִים אֶת-הָאִשָּׁה, כִּי-יָפָה הִוא מְאֹד… וַתֻּקַּח הָאִשָּׁה, בֵּית פַּרְעֹה.

    …just as Joseph – whose sojourn in Egypt is the first step descent of the rest of the Children of Israel – becomes an object of sexual desire as soon as he arrives, and is imprisoned in the house of one of Pharaoh’s ministers. (Gen. 39)

    Verse 17:

    But the Lord afflicted Pharaoh and his household with many plagues on account of Sarai, the wife of Avram…

    וַיְנַגַּע ה אֶת-פַּרְעֹה נְגָעִים גְּדֹלִים, וְאֶת-בֵּיתוֹ, עַל-דְּבַר שָׂרַי, אֵשֶׁת אַבְרָם.

    …just as God will famously bring the Ten Plagues upon Egypt to liberate the Israelites, concluding with one that afflicts Pharaoh’s own household. (Exod. 7-12)

    Verse 20:

    And so they sent him off with his wife…

    וַיְשַׁלְּחוּ אֹתוֹ וְאֶת-אִשְׁתּוֹ

    …just as the Pharaoh in Exodus will eventually relent and send out all of the Israelites. (Exod. 14)

    Chapter 13, verse 2:

    Now Avram was weighed down by riches, in cattle, silver and gold…

    וְאַבְרָם, כָּבֵד מְאֹד, בַּמִּקְנֶה, בַּכֶּסֶף וּבַזָּהָב

    …just as the Israelites left Egypt with riches of silver and gold. (Exod. 11)

    It is a remarkable amount of major foreshadowing, in just the course of 12 lines. “The actions of the parents,” indeed…

    *

    There is one thing in the midst of those 12 lines, however, that does not seem to have an obvious parallel in the events of the Exodus. Look at verses 11-13:

    As [Avram] was about to enter Egypt, he said to his wife Sarai, “I know what a beautiful woman you are. If the Egyptians see you, they will kill me and let you live. Please say that you are my sister, so that things go well for me, and I remain alive because of you.

    יא וַיְהִי, כַּאֲשֶׁר הִקְרִיב לָבוֹא מִצְרָיְמָה; וַיֹּאמֶר, אֶל-שָׂרַי אִשְׁתּוֹ, הִנֵּה-נָא יָדַעְתִּי, כִּי אִשָּׁה יְפַת-מַרְאֶה אָתְּ. יב וְהָיָה, כִּי-יִרְאוּ אֹתָךְ הַמִּצְרִים, וְאָמְרוּ, אִשְׁתּוֹ זֹאת; וְהָרְגוּ אֹתִי, וְאֹתָךְ יְחַיּוּ. יג אִמְרִי-נָא, אֲחֹתִי אָתְּ–לְמַעַן יִיטַב-לִי בַעֲבוּרֵךְ, וְחָיְתָה נַפְשִׁי בִּגְלָלֵךְ.

    This episode has troubled the commentators greatly. Abraham is effectively asking his wife to lie and – even worse – he is putting her in danger in order save his own hide! What kind of role model is this? How could the great patriarch, the founder of our faith, behave in such a shifty, cowardly manner?

    The commentators struggle to come up with answers: Maybe they were close enough relatives, that it was as if she was his sister, and he wasn’t really lying? Maybe it’s just acceptable to lie to save your life?

    But none of these answers really addresses the real problem: that Abraham knowingly put his wife in danger!

    To deal with that, we have to turn back again to Nachmanides, who gives a raw, no-holds-barred interpretation of Abraham’s actions. In fact, what he says is so severe that if the great Nachmanides hadn’t said it, I would be a little hesitant to say it myself:

    Know that Abraham erred, and committed a great sin. For he brought his righteous wife into the threat of violation because he was afraid that they would kill him. He should have trusted that the Lord would save him and his wife and all he had, for God has the power to help and to save.

    ודע כי אברהם אבינו חטא חטא גדול בשגגה שהביא אשתו הצדקת במכשול עון מפני פחדו פן יהרגוהו והיה לו לבטוח בשם שיציל אותו ואת אשתו ואת כל אשר לו כי יש באלקים כח לעזור ולהציל

    You hear that? Abraham sinned! And he sinned because he was scared. He risked his wife’s honor and safety because he was afraid for his life. What a devastating condemnation of the great patriarch.

    Well, all I can say is that I guess we’re lucky that this “action” was the one that wouldn’t be replayed throughout the generations!

    But not so fast. It’s true, after one generation goes by, there seems to be no echo of this particular scene in the Exodus story – no shoving those we love into danger in order to save ourselves. But what about the other thing Nachmanides says? What about Abraham’s motivation?

    He was afraid… He should have trusted the Lord.

    In other words, Abraham, the father of our faith, struggled with doubt. And that struggle is indeed a scene that his children have been reenacting ever since.

    From the moment Moses is called upon to lead the Children of Israel out of Egypt, he worries, “they will not believe.” (Exod. 4:1) And again and again, through the long journey in the desert, that is exactly what happens. At every hint of danger, whenever food is scarce, they lose faith. Even after God has saved them from slavery, even after revelation on Mount Sinai, they lose faith so quickly it seems as if they never had it to begin with. And when the journey has ended, and Moses is reflecting back on everything they’ve been through, he says, as if realizing he was right to begin with:

    The Lord your God goes before you, and will fight for you, just as God did for you in Egypt before your very eyes. And in the wilderness, where you saw how the Lord your God carried you, as a man carries his child, all the way that you have traveled until you came to this place.

    Yet for all that, you have no faith in the Lord your God… (Deut. 1:30-32)

    ל ה אֱלֹקיכֶם הַהֹלֵךְ לִפְנֵיכֶם, הוּא יִלָּחֵם לָכֶם: כְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה אִתְּכֶם, בְּמִצְרַיִם–לְעֵינֵיכֶם. לא וּבַמִּדְבָּר, אֲשֶׁר רָאִיתָ, אֲשֶׁר נְשָׂאֲךָ ה אֱלֹקיךָ, כַּאֲשֶׁר יִשָּׂא-אִישׁ אֶת-בְּנוֹ–בְּכָל-הַדֶּרֶךְ אֲשֶׁר הֲלַכְתֶּם, עַד-בֹּאֲכֶם עַד-הַמָּקוֹם הַזֶּה. לב וּבַדָּבָר, הַזֶּה–אֵינְכֶם, מַאֲמִינִם, בַּה, אֱלֹקיכֶם.

    They struggled with faith. And thousands of years later, we still struggle with faith.

    Because faith is hard. And fear creates doubt. Even for our Father Abraham.

    So as long as we continue to walk in the footsteps of his faith, it seems we are also destined to doubt.

    Reply
  25. Wendy

    From My Jewish Learning

    What Does It Mean To Be A Blessing?
    Blessings are not meant to flow into us, but rather to flow through us.

    BY HANAN SCHLESINGER

    Many of us know a thing or two about saying a blessing. We know for example, how to recite a blessing before lighting Shabbat candles and Hanukkah candles. Some of us recite tens of blessings every day. But what do we know about BEING a blessing?

    Only in one instance in the whole Torah do we find an injunction to make a blessing – the commandment to bless God after enjoying a meal. But the idea of BEING a blessing appears over and over again in the Book of Genesis, the first time of which is in God’s words to Abraham in this week’s Torah portion, Parshat Lekh Lekha:

    I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you;
    I will make your name great, and you shall be a blessing…
    And all the families of the earth shall be blessed because of you.
    Yes we must behave so that ‘all of the families of the earth shall be blessed’ through the agency of the Jewish People. We endeavor to be a light unto the nations. But that’s a big, macro level concept.
    It appears a bit overwhelming, leaving us wondering how exactly do we go about it.

    However, there is something here on the micro level as well: Just “be a blessing.” What does it mean to be a blessing? Well, God blesses us and we must pass the blessings along. We ought never to hoard His blessings for ourselves. God gives life, and light, and sustenance and hope, and so must we give these blessings to others as well.

    Kabbalistic wisdom, while describing the mystical process that brought into existence both the tools for fashioning the world as well as the world itself, talks of two different types of vessels for God’s creative energy. Some were containers open at the top and closed at the bottom. They allowed the life force to flow in but did not let it flow out of the other end. The other type served as conduits for divinity; they were not stopped up at the bottom. The spirit flowed in on one side and out from the other side. Those that received but did not give ultimately self-destructed; they shattered from the abundance of good that they tried to contain within themselves. Only those that passed on what they received, that were part of an interconnective network on both ends, fulfilled their function and were able to serve God’s creative purpose.

    This goes for us as well — we must take a cue from the vessels of creation. No true good can be enjoyed without passing it on. We too must be open-ended vessels. Blessings are not meant to flow into us, but rather to flow through us.

    How do you be a blessing? With a smile, or with a hug. By always thinking of giving, of helping, of lending a hand. By offering an invitation instead of waiting to receive one. By opening up to a stranger, by making someone feel at home. By teaching, and helping others to learn. By offering insight and inspiration. By encouragement or a kind word. It is not hard to find ways to be a blessing – you just have to constantly be aware of it.

    One should always ask himself: Is the world a bit of a better place today because of me? Is it good for the world that I am here? Has my existence added anything to the sum total of blessing in the world? We compute our carbon imprint, and our ecological footprint gives us pause, and that is as it should be. But those concerns are only a matter of doing as little harm as possible. We must go beyond that and strive not only to refrain from damaging but to repair as well.

    Let us ponder our blessing input, and then strive, always strive, to be a living blessing.

    Reply
  26. Wendy

    From Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies

    Shabbat Lekh Lekha

    By: Rabbi Cheryl Peretz

    It’s All in the Name
    Torah Reading: Genesis12:1 – 17:27
    Haftarah Reading: Isaiah 40:27 – 41:16

    In one verse, this week’s Torah portion reminds us of the great significance the Jewish tradition places on names: “And you shall no longer be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham for I make you the father of many nations.” (Genesis 17:5)

    With the addition of just one letter, at the age of ninety-nine, Abram becomes Abraham and his transformation to the father of many nations is confirmed. At the same time, Abraham is not the only biblical figure whose name is changed. Sarai becomes Sara; Jacob becomes Israel. Joseph, Joshua and Esther all experience name changes. From these models, a long-standing custom emerged to introduce a name change after a grave illness or other life-changing moment.

    So important is choosing a name that rabbinic midrash teaches that when parents name a child, they experience a small piece of prophecy for from one’s name comes his/her destiny. We are born into a particular family with a particular history and with a particular set of parents who hold hopes and dreams for our future. As one is named, so too is his/her reputation. This is, what is meant in the Book of Samuel “Kshem ken hu – like his name so is he.” So, Ashkenazic Jews name children after those no longer living, while Sephardic Jews name children after the living – both hoping and praying that each child will be endowed with the positive traits and strong image as the one for whom she/he is named.

    In the end, we create our own name by what we do in the world, the way we act, the people we touch, the values we manifest. It is up to each one of us to be worthy of the name we have been given – to create a good reputation, to live in kindness, compassion, and commitment, and to remember the lesson of the book Ecclesiastes: “A good name is better than fragrant oil.”

    Ken yehi ratzon – so may it be.

    Reply
  27. Wendy

    From Brian Yoseph Schachter-Brooks

    Look Up – Parshat Lekh L’kha

    When I was young, there was something called “television.” I remember those long afternoons: as the sunlight that poured through the living room windows waned minute by minute, the glow of the television grew stronger and stronger – the Brady Bunch, the Flintstones, All in the Family, the Jeffersons, Carol Burnett, Star Trek. Total absorption. As the hours went by, and the nagging feeling that other things had to get done (like my homework) increased, I would cling ever more ferociously to the characters and narratives beaming from the screen. Eventually the spell would be broken only by hunger, or having to go the bathroom, or my mother.

    Oh yes, the screen is still just as strong; stronger in fact.

    No more need for big pieces of furniture; my daughter can take a screen under a blanket and hide from everyone. Where did she go?

    I have strategies for prying my children away from their screens. Usually, there are meltdowns and tears. But occasionally, I am successful. It works best if I am present when the screen time begins, and I can secure an agreement; a “covenant” of sorts: “Do you promise to turn off the screen and give it to me when I ask you to, without any arguments and without any Please Abba Just One More Minute?

    “Yes, Abba.”

    Then, when it’s time, the power of the covenant kicks in, and she gives it right back – no resistance at all. This proves: no matter how hypnotized we become by something, we do have the power to let it go, if we are properly prepared.

    This is so crucial to understand, if we wish to put down an even more powerful screen –the screen of our own minds, upon which we project the drama of our lives – also known as “ego.”

    Most people are glued to the screen of ego almost constantly, looking up only occasionally when the walls of the heart are breached, or when a temporary lapse in the noise of the mind allows the radiant silence to shine through, even if for only a moment.

    But we need not be screen addicts; we can put down the ego anytime. Listen: The Voice of the Beloved is calling you to dinner – there’s a banquet prepared just for you! Let go of your judgments about yourself and others. Let go of how you wish things were. Let go of your obsessions, assertions, denials, angers, grudges… there is something so much better than all of that, if you would be willing to set it aside, look up and go.

    לֶךְ־לְךָ֛ מֵֽאַרְצְךָ֥ וּמִמּֽוֹלַדְתְּךָ֖ וּמִבֵּ֣ית אָבִ֑יךָ אֶל־הָאָ֖רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֥ר אַרְאֶֽךָּ
    Go for yourself from your land, from your family, from your father’s house, to the land I will show you…

    All those opinions, assertions, cravings, disappointments – they seem so real, so important. But they aren’t the real you. They are imprints from your “land” – your culture, your inherited identity, patterns from your family, your experiences, your traumas – but you need not be imprisoned by them.

    Lekh L’kha – go for yourself – el ha’arets asher arekha – to the land that I will show you…

    We’re being called to the banquet hall and the feast is waiting. The Voice is calling you constantly, and whatever is constant is easily ignored. But you can tune into the Call if you’re willing to wake up from the ego’s hypnosis. The key is to have a covenant– commit to stop at regular times, turn away from the pull of the ego and toward the fullness of this moment…

    וַיִּֽבֶן־שָׁ֤ם מִזְבֵּ֨חַ֙ לַֽיהֹוָ֔ה וַיִּקְרָ֖א בְּשֵׁ֥ם יְהֹוָֽה
    And there he built an altar and called upon the Name of the Divine…

    The essential thing is to build a space in time, and commit to regularly withdraw from the ego’s momentum for long enough to connect with Reality, with the Divine. If you want to hear the Call, then call out – this is the movement of prayer. And then, be the stillness that hears – this is the spaciousness of meditation. Make a covenant to do it every day – even a few minutes goes a long way!

    ק֚וּם הִתְהַלֵּ֣ךְ בָּאָ֔רֶץ לְאָרְכָּ֖הּ וּלְרָחְבָּ֑הּ כִּ֥י לְךָ֖ אֶתְּנֶֽנָּה
    Rise up, walk the Land, it’s length and breadth, because to you I give it…

    The ego believes itself to be a separate entity, navigating through the “Land.” But in truth the Land is fully yours. You are the Land, because everything arising in your experience in this moment is truly you; it all arises in the open space of this moment, which is not separate from the awareness that you are…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *